« Courier finally uses some ink on Democrat in Mayor's race | Main | I've won a prize »

New Orleans residents who had insurance policies that excluded water damage lose in court

Saw this on the net today:

ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW ORLEANS — Hurricane Katrina victims whose homes and businesses were destroyed when floodwaters breached levees in the 2005 storm cannot recover money from their insurance companies for the damages, a federal appeals court ruled today.

“This event was excluded from coverage under the plaintiffs’ insurance policies, and under Louisiana law, we are bound to enforce the unambiguous terms of their insurance contracts as written,” Judge Carolyn King wrote for a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

As a result, the panel found those who filed the suit “are not entitled to recover under their policies,” she said.

More than a dozen insurance companies, including Allstate and Travelers, were defendants.

The decision overturns a ruling by U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval Jr., who in November sided with policyholders arguing that language excluding water damage from some of their insurance policies was ambiguous.

Duval said the policies did not distinguish between floods caused by an act of God — such as excessive rainfall — and floods caused by an act of man, which would include the levee breaches following Katrina’s landfall.

But the appeals panel concluded that “even if the plaintiffs can prove that the levees were negligently designed, constructed, or maintained and that the breaches were due to this negligence, the flood exclusions in the plaintiffs’ policies unambiguously preclude their recovery.”

Court rules against Katrina victims in flood insurance case

Who in their right mind would NOT buy insurance that covers flood damage if you live in a flood prone area like the bowl we call New Orleans?

No one would.

Then again, if you live in a flood prone area - you can't get regular insurance coverage for water damage. You must buy flood insurance from the federal government.

My guess is average people don't know that and I also guess that some of that info may have been withheld so the broker could make a sale on the policy. It wouldn't be the first time.

Find other posts with tags: , , , ,

Comments are now closed for this entry.


Archives

Recent Comments

D.R.M. on Can't we all just get along: "I need to point out that Bill Clinton was popular and won reelection because he

Thomas on Findlay Mayor forum available online: Hey ya Doug, Listen to the event or watch it through FC Politicos website. Dec

Thomas on Findlay Mayor Race Open?: Yeah Nate, I know that the website WAS down due to updates/upgrades to it. Sinc

ross james on Some thoughts on the Jena 6 protests: I have long come to the sad conclusion that whites and blacks have no future in

Doug Berger on Big Ten Conference profiting from tax payers: I have always felt that state schools shouldn't be allowed to have games on cabl

Keytype on Sicko makes the point: Top 10 Reasons why CNN is better than the BBC World Service: 10) We can afford

Doug's Views Syndication Feeds


RSS 2.0

Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in My MSN
Subscribe in Rojo
Add to Google




Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
mtbadge.gif
Powered by
Movable Type 3.36