<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Doug&#039;s Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dougberger.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dougberger.net</link>
	<description>Journal of an independent progressive atheistic humanist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eurythmics Mended My Broken Heart by cadfile</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/02/eurythmics-mended-my-broken-heart.html/comment-page-1#comment-4888</link>
		<dc:creator>cadfile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1338#comment-4888</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nice piece, can we link to it from our Eurythmics fan site?&lt;/blockquote&gt;  
  
Sure feel free to link to it. Glad you liked it.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nice piece, can we link to it from our Eurythmics fan site?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure feel free to link to it. Glad you liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eurythmics Mended My Broken Heart by steve</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/02/eurythmics-mended-my-broken-heart.html/comment-page-1#comment-4887</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1338#comment-4887</guid>
		<description>Nice piece, can we link to it from our Eurythmics fan site? 
 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eurythmics.me.uk/2012/02/16/advert-of-the-week-dave-stewart-slyfi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Advert Of The Week: Dave Stewart SlyFi&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece, can we link to it from our Eurythmics fan site? </p>
<p>My recent post <a href="http://www.eurythmics.me.uk/2012/02/16/advert-of-the-week-dave-stewart-slyfi/" rel="nofollow">Advert Of The Week: Dave Stewart SlyFi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics by cadfile</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/01/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator>cadfile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1329#comment-4879</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t watched them but I did read about them. A conservative friend of mine posted the PolitiFact article about that debt chart and a liberal friend did the corrected chart independent of PolitiFact. Looks like I&#039;ll have to treat them like I did HuffPost and stop using their information and stop linking to them </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't watched them but I did read about them. A conservative friend of mine posted the PolitiFact article about that debt chart and a liberal friend did the corrected chart independent of PolitiFact. Looks like I'll have to treat them like I did HuffPost and stop using their information and stop linking to them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics by vjack</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/01/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-4878</link>
		<dc:creator>vjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1329#comment-4878</guid>
		<description>Did you happen to catch Maddow&#039;s last couple of shows? She&#039;s been calling into question the assumption that PolitiFact is a competent fact-checker. Made me think I may have been mistaken to use them in the past, as some of their conclusions (like the one you mention here) seem to be without basis. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you happen to catch Maddow's last couple of shows? She's been calling into question the assumption that PolitiFact is a competent fact-checker. Made me think I may have been mistaken to use them in the past, as some of their conclusions (like the one you mention here) seem to be without basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Atheist Party Is Too Thin For A Political Party by cadfile</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/01/national-atheist-party-is-too-thin-for-a-political-party.html/comment-page-1#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>cadfile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1310#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>And usually people read the whole post before complaining about something rather than jumping to conclusions. In fact I did visit the website and I even quoted a good bit from their &quot;About us&quot; page.  
  
If you read the whole post you will also read the following:  
  
&lt;blockquote&gt;That is all well and good but beyond support for separation of church and state, I don&#8217;t think atheists can have a singular political view. I know many liberal atheists and I know quite a few Libertarian and conservative atheists. A political party needs to have a platform that most supporters agree on. I&#8217;m pretty sure there will be a large group of atheists that will refute that the NAP speaks for them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  
  
To rehash I said that any political platform BEYOND just the separation issue is the wrong way to go because Atheists don&#039;t all believe the same thing politically.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And usually people read the whole post before complaining about something rather than jumping to conclusions. In fact I did visit the website and I even quoted a good bit from their "About us" page.  </p>
<p>If you read the whole post you will also read the following:  </p>
<blockquote><p>That is all well and good but beyond support for separation of church and state, I don&rsquo;t think atheists can have a singular political view. I know many liberal atheists and I know quite a few Libertarian and conservative atheists. A political party needs to have a platform that most supporters agree on. I&rsquo;m pretty sure there will be a large group of atheists that will refute that the NAP speaks for them.</p></blockquote>
<p>To rehash I said that any political platform BEYOND just the separation issue is the wrong way to go because Atheists don't all believe the same thing politically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Atheist Party Is Too Thin For A Political Party by A.N.Noying</title>
		<link>http://www.dougberger.net/archive/2012/01/national-atheist-party-is-too-thin-for-a-political-party.html/comment-page-1#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>A.N.Noying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dougberger.net/?p=1310#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>If you believe the only political platform for an Atheist Party is the Separation issue, then you have been living in a tunnel. Read their site and you may learn a thing or two. You should investigate before you speak. Thats usually the order that a good reporter takes. Read and think. Then speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe the only political platform for an Atheist Party is the Separation issue, then you have been living in a tunnel. Read their site and you may learn a thing or two. You should investigate before you speak. Thats usually the order that a good reporter takes. Read and think. Then speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

