A Visit Home

Last weekend I had a chance to visit Findlay and Hancock County. Didn’t you know I don’t live there? I lived there for the first 18 years of my life but chose to move out when I went to college.

It is good to be gone for a few months or years so you can come back and notice any changes. This time I had the chance to drive around in the daylight.

I ate at IHOP for the first time in about 10 years. The first time was back on a trip through South Carolina. The far eastside of Findlay continues to grow. Even up through high school, there was nothing past the Meijer store, now there are sub divisions and retail stores and restaurants. IHOP actually had good food. Not that I thought they didn’t but the closest to IHOP that I’ve had before is the greasy spoon Waffle House. But IHOP is more like Shoney’s or Perkins.

On Friday night I ate at Tony’s Pizza and Ribs on US 224 west. Tony’s has the best pizza and BBQ in Hancock County. It use to be in McComb but due to a poor business decision on the part of Tony’s landlord, it moved to Findlay in a larger building.

Also on Friday night my mom and I went to see Starsky and Hutch at the Carmike 6 at the Findlay Mall. I have been pampered too much with AMC in Columbus. Carmike didn’t have stadium seating nor did they have arm rests that could be folded out of the way for us larger folks. After 90 minutes I had to stand up to restore the circulation in my legs. The movie was funny and brought back a lot of memories for those of us who lived the 70’s. Unfortunately, most in the audience were too young to catch the cultural jokes.

When I got to Findlay on that Thursday my mom let me know that The Courier had published a letter to the editor I had sent in earlier in the week. Here is the text I sent them:

I write today to comment on the article “Oxley: Economy faring well” that was published online on 3/23/2004.

Rep. Oxley took time during is speech to the Findlay Rotary Club to comment about the series the Toledo Blade published on Oxley back in December, which by the way appeared in several newspapers in the 4th District except The Courier.

He compared Hancock and Lucas county, pointing out that economically that Hancock county is doing better than Lucas county.

He said “the civic leaders and citizens of Hancock County, and throughout the 4th District, come together in public-private partnerships for the common good. They put aside politics when it comes to jobs. I think you have to have lived here to understand that.”

I find it ironic that Oxley would claim one would have to live here to understand. Oxley may have his permanent residence in Findlay but has spent 99% of his time either at his home in the Washington DC area or on trips paid for by the special interest groups that want him to vote and act for their best interests.

If Oxley really lived in Findlay he would know that the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority built and owns the building that was built for the Kuss Corp back in 2001 and that the State of Ohio provided $45,000 for an investment and training grant for the company for example.

Then there are the state grants that will be used to fix the bridges and roads that the county never seems to have enough money to fix. No, Hancock county isn’t “dependent on the state and federal government for handouts”.

Usually the public-private partnerships seem to involve the private building something and the public footing the bill for building the roads, putting in the sewers, and providing the fire protection at little or no cost to the development.

Douglas Berger

Naturally, the editor cut the line where I pointed out the Blade Oxley series had run in some of the papers in the 4th District except for the Courier.

Just today the Courier reported that Findlay City Council’s Parks and Recreation Committee recommended that the city replace the old Hancock Rec Center with a new facility over 15 years and costing $20 million. The current center that the city traded the county for last year was built in 1973 has no air conditioning and only a boys locker room.

HRC has been used a hot political issue over the years. Politicians who fall over themselves to give welfare to businesses have not wanted to spend the money on a new recreation center at any price. Jobs are important to the community but to ignore other elements that form a vibrant attractive community is just as foolish. Businesses looking to add jobs to a community also look at the opportunities in the community for their new employees like good schools and good recreation facilities.

Dublin, a suburb of Columbus, has about the same population as Findlay and they built a top notch recreation center that not only has a gym and pool but also has a community hall, a theater, classrooms, teen center, and Senior center. It cost $14 million and the debt is shared by the users through memberships. Currently, Findlay residents pay fees to use the Riverside Park pool.

It can be done if the current city leadership can see the long term benefits of building a new HRC rather than the short term monetary costs.

Originally posted on the blog “Hancock County Politics Unfiltered”

10 Commandments Letter Exchange

Image of the Bill of Rights

I write letters to the editor of local newspapers I read. Usually something I read upsets me enough I have to respond.

I wrote in response to an article related to the Judge Roy Moore 10 Commandments legal case. Moore, former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court forced his religious beliefs on the citizens of his state by erecting a stone slab with the Holy Bible’s 10 Commandments engraved on it. At the time Moore had been ordered by a Federal Court to remove the Decalogue. Many conservative politicians, like State Rep. Mike Gilb (R-Findlay) fell over themselves to propose and vote on resolutions in support of Moore and the posting of the Decalogue in public buildings like courthouses.

Continue reading “10 Commandments Letter Exchange”

Meet the Candidates…. YAWN

The Hancock Republican Party held a “Meet the Candidates” event during their First Friday Luncheon Club on February 6th.

The guests were the nine candidates running for the two open slots on the Hancock County Commissioners. As the headline read in the Findlay Courier, “Candidate views similar”.

Read the Courier article

It really isn’t important to name the candidates here since they were so interchangeable. But that’s what happens when a party dominates the local scene. Instead of new ideas and wanting to get enthusiastic, you get BLAH.

The participants were given two minutes to introduce themselves and then one minute to answer a series of questions posed from the audience.

Some the questions were:

If they would meet new Findlay Mayor Tony Iriti’s pledge to nurture cooperation between the city and the county, and how they would do it.

If they would put the quarter-percent sales tax increase, used to fund the county’s criminal justice system, back on the ballot if necessary or if they would simply impose it.

How they would attract well-paying jobs to the county.

But like true modern politicians none of them really answered the questions.

One candidate, during the intro part of the event, even told people to read his bio in a pamphlet his campaign had printed up.

On the question about how they would attract well-paying jobs to the county, no one mentioned a specific plan. They only mentioned working closely with the Chamber of Commerce.

“Well, duh….” comes to mind.

On the issue of the recent sales tax hike to fund the sheriff’s office, some said they would wait and see if it needs to be renewed while a couple pledged to put it on the ballot if needed.

Left unanswered, like how to bring more jobs to the county (which by the way the county really doesn’t need what with consistently having one of the lowest unemployment rates in the state), the participants also didn’t answer questions not asked, like how would they improve the county. What would they do about the lack of affordable housing? How would they protect farmland from the annexation fever of the city of Findlay? What are their feelings about the recent efforts to zone various township land? What are their views on the need for strong environmental regulations?

The meet and greet reminded me of interviewing 16 year olds for a fast food job and each one saying they are “people person”. Each are just as qualified but none stand out from the crowd.

YAWN….

Originally posted on the blog “Hancock County Politics Unfiltered”

Prayer opens council meeting?

Read this interesting story in the Findlay (Ohio) Courier on Wednesday 1/21/2004:

Prayer opens council meeting
By DENISE GRANT
STAFF WRITER

Findlay City Council, operating under new rules of order, opened its council meeting on Tuesday with an invocation led by the Rev. Ben Borsay of Gateway Church.

Council agreed earlier this month, when it adopted its new procedures for the year, to give the council president authority to invite members of the clergy and community to open its sessions with prayer.

Council members had debated the issue of adding formal prayer to council meetings in 2002, but there was enough opposition among members then that the issue was dropped.

At the time, council members Robert Nichols, Marcia Barkey and John Sausser all expressed concerns about opening council meetings with prayer. Sausser and Barkey said religion is a private, not public, matter. Nichols was concerned about fairness. All three ended their terms on council on Dec. 31.

Click here to read full story

I found the story interesting because the council, which spends time debating the importance of replacing the Bolton St. bridge after it had been closed for several years, which debated the need of the Hancock Rec Center in a city that doesn’t have enough community space as it is, and which finds a serious issue in the strength of recently installed street lights, would not only vote to allow the council president the authority to hold a prayer before the meetings but also not entertain any public input on the issue. Spending tax dollars for it as well.

I understand that religion is important to most of the community and seems to be very important to council president Schuck that he would be so adamant in getting the sole authority to decide who gives the prayer, BUT Findlay City Council has no business mixing religion and government.

As former council members Marcia Barkey and John Sausser said in 2002 as quoted in the story, religion is a personal private matter. The government can’t and shouldn’t get involved in your religious beliefs and for the life of me I can’t imagine why educated elected officials of our government would want their religion involved with their governing.

It’s like if the majority of council voted to sing the University of Michigan fight song before council meetings. Most people would agree that it wouldn’t be a proper use of council’s time and would insult those members of the community who don’t support the school up north. And I’m sure there would heated public debates about it.

I find it highly insulting to the Founders of this great country, who knew enough to keep church and state separate, that council president Schuck thinks that only prayers from different denominations or a moment of silence would be permitted. What is his qualifications to decide which religious beliefs would be allowed to lead the prayer? Is that in the job description of council president?

If Mr. Schuck is adamant about having a prayer before council meetings then he and his majority are free to meet around the flag pole in Dorney Plaza and pray. They can all then move to council chambers, call the meeting to order, and do the job they were elected to do.

Originally posted on the blog “Hancock County Politics Unfiltered”